cheap web hosting review web hosting service

This web site is about cheap web hosting review, web hosting service, web hosting user reviews, ecommerce web hosting, dedicated server. All the news about cheap web hosting review

Saturday, May 10, 2008

Learn all about web hosting user reviews

A synopsis on web hosting user reviews

Anyway, if you have used Godaddy domain registration service or hosting products, you may have noticed the difficulty in to the final destination in checkout process. I’ve noticed some problems too. Here’s a pretty detailed criticism of GoDaddy’s 16-step checkout process which may be “brainless marketing at its finest.” A great article on the sheer stupidity of the GoDaddy checkout process. They truly are the 16 gates of hell. The author asks, “Why would a company do this to its customers?”

SEO: Lokasi Hosting Menentukan SEO

Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:07:40 +0000
SEO juga ditentukan oleh lokasi hosting. Untuk hosting IIX ada kelemahannya. Karena IIX cepat untuk Indonesia, sangat lambat buat luar Indonesia, bot-bot dari Google, Yahoo, MSN, Alexa, DMOZ, dll akan mengalami kesulitan mengakses web anda.
Ini ada artikel mengenai SEO ditentukan oleh lokasi hosting:
http://www.comauth.co.nz/the-seo-guys-blog/web-hosting-server-location-seo.html
Copyright © 2007Dapur Hosting(digitalfingerprint: 8f57a6d5215d02f26c482a6410e1682f)Share This

Houston, Texas - (The Hosting News) - May 6, 2008 - The Planet privately held dedicated web hosting company, has unveiled six new promotions for May, including savings of up to 26 percent on its two Check Point solutions, as the company’s first-ever firewall discount.

Uptime Institute Says Power to Cost 300-2250% More Than Server Hardware; What Does This Mean?

Sun, 11 Mar 2007 22:31:00 -0400

I came across Uptime Institute founder Ken Brill's CIO Magazine article via 3tera VP Marketing Bert Armijo's blog.



Ken says while hardware prices are falling, total cost of data center ownership is headed through the roof. 5 years from now, the purchase price for a rack of servers will drop 27.5% from $138K today to just $103K. But while it only takes 15 kilowatts to power that rack right now, the energy requirement will rise to 22 - 170 kilowatts by 2012. It could cost as much as $2.3 million to power/cool $103K worth of gear throughout its 3-year lifespan.



(I'm not sure if this figure includes switches and routers and such. A recent Cisco/APC/Emerson study shows that servers/storage/cooling consume 76% of data center power, with 11% going to networking equipment, 3% lighting, and 10% power conversion losses. If Uptime's calculations didn't take the other 24% into account, Ken's $2.3M becomes over $3M!)



I've been thinking about Ken's stats and trying to understand what they mean. As a point of reference, I was looking at Dell's website, which advertises the 4U PowerEdge 6950 dual core, dual processor Opteron server for about $9K. Is Ken saying that:



(a) This particular machine will cost 27.5% less 5 years from now?



(b) 2012's late model machines will sell for 27.5% less than what's on the market today?



(c) The amount of server hardware that fills up 4U of space will be available for $6500 in 2012?



If we assume he means (c), and we accept Sun's claim that "server performance, power and space efficiencies are improving at up to 40% annually on average, and could double every 2 years", then 4U of space may be able to accommodate not one but 4 servers that each feature 4x more processing power and 4x greater energy efficiency.



In other words, $6,500 could buy you 16x more computing resources than that dual Opteron! If that's the case, you might even be able to afford $1M per rack per year in electricity. But only if you virtualize like crazy. No more leasing data center space per square foot or per rack. No more dedicated servers, either. The average customer won't need 4x more processing power in 5 years, which means you won't be able to justify turning on a whole entire server just for them.



You'd also have to replace hardware early and often. Sun recently announced a refresh service for swapping out your servers at least 3 times over 42 months. At first I thought that sounded wasteful, but if server power efficiency is improving at 40% per year, holding on to old gear might end up costing you more. Again, virtualization would be a must. You wouldn't want customer apps to become attached to machines that will be phased out before long.



Bert from 3tera says changes in data center economics will make it increasingly difficult for enterprise CIOs to justify operating their own facilities. But they won't outsource to traditional colo or dedicated server providers. Instead, he agrees with Cassatt CEO Bill Coleman that in the near-ish future, you'll be "paying for data center horsepower the same way you pay for electricity or gas". I think so too. How about you?



PS - On a somewhat related note, eWeek says Intel will release its "Clovertown" chips today. The quad core processors have a 50 watt thermal envelope, versus 80-120 watts on earlier models. That's a 38-60% drop.



PPS - Also, speaking of the Uptime Institute, check out this SearchDataCenter.com interview on how they've helped The Planet save $10K/month on electricity. The Planet, the article says, is looking to expand beyond Texas into the Midwest.





Network Solutions is a provider of e-business solutions and domain name registration service, offering a full range of online services to small and medium enterprises, including web hosting, web design, e-commerce software, search engine marketing, SSL certificates, e-mail services and domain name registration. Network Solutions draws on over 29 years of experience to make it simple and affordable for customers to build and manage an online presence through a one-stop web Solutions provider.

CSS Validator

Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:49:00 +0000
Check Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) and (X)HTML documents with style sheets:
http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/
Copyright © 2007Dapur Hosting(digitalfingerprint: 8f57a6d5215d02f26c482a6410e1682f)Share This

Recommended web hosting user reviews Items



I've been with hostican for 6 months now with 99.99% uptime which is tracked by
three 3rd party monitoring systems at 5 minute intervals.



The support is excellent. I've called at all hours including 3am to get a live
person. NONE of their support is outsourced and I have not had to wait more than
60 seconds on hold to get a real, live, not outsourced person to help me.



They use cpanel 11 and are quick about updates. Everything is smooth. website
speed is super fast and i've used 500GB of the 2500GB bandwidth plan with NO
PROBLEMS AT ALL. I've also used 15gb of space. The server remains fast, speedy,
no downtime, and great support.



100% A+ for hostican from me. I do not hesitate to recommend hostican to any one
who needs a host.



Click Here to go to hostican website.




HDMI Male to HDMI Male Cable: 6 ft - $5.99
Cambridge SoundWorks


domain name
domain names
| |

Labels:

2 Comments:

  • At 2:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Most of the people prefer to select paid web hosting only. It's more security compare to free hosting. More band width and extra spaces are available in paid web hosting.

    web hosting provider

     
  • At 3:15 AM, Anonymous kitchen countertops said…

    Hello
    cheap web hosting review web hosting service
    Thanks for posting! I really like what you've acquired here; You should keep it up forever! Best of luck
    Thank you!

     

Post a Comment

<< Home